Latest topics
» Mod Conference Room is Feeling Weakby V Wed Jun 09, 2021 10:52 am
» First post of 2017 ?!
by Celstrial Sat Nov 04, 2017 12:06 pm
» First Post of 2016?
by Payton Wed May 25, 2016 3:57 am
» Merry Xmas
by Altera Fri Dec 25, 2015 1:13 pm
» Your Awesome Pictures X
by Rage Thu Dec 17, 2015 2:57 am
» TR
by DigDog Tue Oct 27, 2015 7:07 am
» Wonderful Memories
by Mrsebi Mon Oct 12, 2015 10:06 pm
» Cool New Music
by Mrsebi Sat Oct 10, 2015 12:48 am
» Posting in these forums
by Mrsebi Sat Oct 10, 2015 12:40 am
Top posting users this week
No user |
OUR DOMAIN IS ABOUT TO EXPIRE
Sun Apr 27, 2014 8:43 am by V
but I renewed it.
what have YOU done today, TR?
also I'm not sure if heartbleed effected us but you should probably not change your password, the jitterbug gang are working hard and they need …
what have YOU done today, TR?
also I'm not sure if heartbleed effected us but you should probably not change your password, the jitterbug gang are working hard and they need …
Comments: 30
Log in
Who is online?
In total there are 39 users online :: 0 Registered, 0 Hidden and 39 Guests :: 1 BotNone
Most users ever online was 427 on Fri Oct 04, 2024 2:47 am
Search
Female Armors
+21
Thoru
Alderos
▲Liger X Zero Phoenix▲
Serena
5secondchaos
Wixmagic
Zeo
SS
Janus
Nagi
Xusha
Altera
incinerator1
wwwtoy
Shadow
Erik
Charon
Peregrine
Crystal Lion
Icey
Evangel
25 posters
[TR] - Take Away Tom :: TR :: Dumpster
Page 6 of 7
Page 6 of 7 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
Re: Female Armors
Safiria is an exception... well, not really. She's based off a Staff Member, who probably chose her NPC to look the way she does. Even so, if you compare AQ's version to AQW's version, even MechQuest's version, AQW is still the most revealing. (Might I also add AQW's ver took away the original's silver wings?)
Now, the topic is the female AQW players, not others.
Might I refer back to my OP: The base tier classes and secondary tier classes: http://yfrog.com/1s86684011p
Take, as an example, Warrior and Warlord. Heavily armored, random section of skin showing the thighs. Necessary? I think not.
Now, the topic is the female AQW players, not others.
Might I refer back to my OP: The base tier classes and secondary tier classes: http://yfrog.com/1s86684011p
Take, as an example, Warrior and Warlord. Heavily armored, random section of skin showing the thighs. Necessary? I think not.
Re: Female Armors
Crystal Lion wrote:It fits Safiria, obviously. I'm talking the female hero player. Usually, in other AE games, it's not implied that the player is a Helen of Troy, hence the fewer revealing clothes she has to wear. Suddenly, in AQW, she must wear leotards and slitted skirts almost all the time, while the game still doesn't fix her in the role as a seductress, but that of a fighter/mage/whatever class she is. The player doesn't have any actual option to pick a love interest in the game, that sort of situation is only created through fanfiction of said AE games.
You did not specifically state that. [quote="Crystal Lion"]I was comparing AQW to other games that have revealing clothes for hardly any rhyme or reason. After all, is there any story in AQW to explain the abrupt change in the policy of compulsory revealing clothes?[quote]
You asked about the story in general, or at least made it out as if you did. I simply proved that there IS story in AQW that suggests clothing of the sort. In the said cutscene, by the way, the character does admit that she is beautiful, he (no gender choice), simply says he is not so gullible. I have yet to see a slitted skirt, by the way. Fishnets and leotards were popular around this time as well, its just they didn't have the same meaning as they are seen as today. The game has, to a very tiny extent, some historical accuracy. Being that I've studied a period similar to this one for many years in my schooling, I can safely say that this game hasn't violated anything too bad. Yes, AQW does have futuristic stuff as well, as its basically a mesh of AQ, DF, and MQ. That aside, the outfits portray a level of realism, and there are a lot that are not this way, more so then not, I'd say.
Evangel wrote:Safiria is an exception... well, not really. She's based off a Staff Member, who probably chose her NPC to look the way she does. Even so, if you compare AQ's version to AQW's version, even MechQuest's version, AQW is still the most revealing. (Might I also add AQW's ver took away the original's silver wings?)
Now, the topic is the female AQW players, not others.
How is the AQW version of this any more revealing? They even added a necklace to cover the cleavage further. Safiria is the most revealing in AQ, as it has the most realistic looking graphics. AQW doesn't even go for realism on any of its graphics.
Xusha- Active Poster
- Zard :
Number of posts : 1130
User Points : 428108
Age : 33
Location : In Search of Unanswered Questions
Re: Female Armors
First you said Safiria seduced everyone except the hero (player) in AQ, then you mentioned she does that in AQW? Might want to check that typo.
I said slitted skirts exist in AQW, yes. Look at the magician/healer classes and their subscriber upgrades, NOT the armors that cover classes. The skirt is merely two parts of cloth, instead of a full pattern as usually found in skirts.
I said slitted skirts exist in AQW, yes. Look at the magician/healer classes and their subscriber upgrades, NOT the armors that cover classes. The skirt is merely two parts of cloth, instead of a full pattern as usually found in skirts.
Re: Female Armors
Crystal Lion wrote:First you said Safiria seduced everyone except the hero (player) in AQ, then you mentioned she does that in AQW? Might want to check that typo.
I said slitted skirts exist in AQW, yes. Look at the magician/healer classes and their subscriber upgrades, NOT the armors that cover classes. The skirt is merely two parts of cloth, instead of a full pattern as usually found in skirts.
Have you not seen a traditional priestess'es robe? Its just like that. And you hit the head on the nail, it ISNT a skirt at all. Its a traditional looking robe. I didn't say it happens in AQW. I said that the player in AQ admits she is beautiful. There is no point to admitting that you're wrong in your own post. There is nothing to be gained from your complaining. If you don't like how it is, don't play. End of story. You're making too big of a deal about this. I've already lost three friends because of this, do you want them all to quit?
Xusha- Active Poster
- Zard :
Number of posts : 1130
User Points : 428108
Age : 33
Location : In Search of Unanswered Questions
Re: Female Armors
Xusha is quite correct. ._. I dont even know if the letter will work.
wwwtoy- Bloodedge
- Zard :
Number of posts : 1035
User Points : 28759
Age : 1965
Location : Beating the living hell out of Terumi
Re: Female Armors
I don't even know who your friends are, but I admit my words are much too harsh. Even if the robe design is traditional, does it really need to expose the entire leg? Just wondering.
Re: Female Armors
Crystal Lion wrote:I don't even know who your friends are, but I admit my words are much too harsh. Even if the robe design is traditional, does it really need to expose the entire leg? Just wondering.
I really don't see the problem with exposing an entire leg. The beach outfit does the same exact thing. How can it be appropriate at one time, but not the other? It is the same part of the body either way, is it not? If you think its okay for a beach outfit, which you should as people near one inevitably go to them, then why not a leg in general? Its not like there are suggestive armors like evening ware or the ever classic battle-bra. AQW is very mild with showing anything.
Xusha- Active Poster
- Zard :
Number of posts : 1130
User Points : 428108
Age : 33
Location : In Search of Unanswered Questions
Re: Female Armors
Also, it's definitely a matter of style. I've seen them attempt to cover the thigh(e.g. Viking Armor) and it just doesn't look right, no offence to Lavitz whatsoever. That's what AQW's style has been like from the beginning, and changing it would be changing WAY too much. The general public likes consistancy, and to completely revamp everything we've known from the start would be just wrong.
Re: Female Armors
Charon wrote:Also, it's definitely a matter of style. I've seen them attempt to cover the thigh(e.g. Viking Armor) and it just doesn't look right, no offence to Lavitz whatsoever. That's what AQW's style has been like from the beginning, and changing it would be changing WAY too much. The general public likes consistancy, and to completely revamp everything we've known from the start would be just wrong.
Of course take into consideration the Lavitz armor was originally designed for males, and AE did a quick body adjust for that.
Xusha- Active Poster
- Zard :
Number of posts : 1130
User Points : 428108
Age : 33
Location : In Search of Unanswered Questions
Re: Female Armors
I think its safe to say that pretty much half of the people agree and the other half disagree.
Re: Female Armors
Evangel wrote:I think its safe to say that pretty much half of the people agree and the other half disagree.
I'd say that most don't care, to be honest. That's why we only have so many posting here. This is just how I think it is though.
Xusha- Active Poster
- Zard :
Number of posts : 1130
User Points : 428108
Age : 33
Location : In Search of Unanswered Questions
Re: Female Armors
Meh in my opinion its fine compared this to Wizard 101. Besides a letter wont work. You wont have enough supporters. <_<
wwwtoy- Bloodedge
- Zard :
Number of posts : 1035
User Points : 28759
Age : 1965
Location : Beating the living hell out of Terumi
Re: Female Armors
As soon as Artix sees that there is people passionate about it, he'd do something. Something. That doesn't exactly mean taking skin out of the picture entirely. Only making it more appropriate.
Look what they did for Shadowslayer Z and the Vampire Emissary and Knight. Do they look like rubbish because no skin is showing for the female versions? I don't think they do.
Look what they did for Shadowslayer Z and the Vampire Emissary and Knight. Do they look like rubbish because no skin is showing for the female versions? I don't think they do.
Re: Female Armors
Evangel wrote:As soon as Artix sees that there is people passionate about it, he'd do something. Something. That doesn't exactly mean taking skin out of the picture entirely. Only making it more appropriate.
Look what they did for Shadowslayer Z and the Vampire Emissary and Knight. Do they look like rubbish because no skin is showing for the female versions? I don't think they do.
That's because you don't have to wear them. Being a female, and seeing the original design for the Shadowslayer, I saw something I thought would be epic. The small change you forced upon it made it into something that is completely abnormal. You should be satisfied with that endeavor, and call it a day.
Xusha- Active Poster
- Zard :
Number of posts : 1130
User Points : 428108
Age : 33
Location : In Search of Unanswered Questions
Re: Female Armors
Shadowslayer X was better... Than people started complaining and we got this. D:<
wwwtoy- Bloodedge
- Zard :
Number of posts : 1035
User Points : 28759
Age : 1965
Location : Beating the living hell out of Terumi
Re: Female Armors
To be honest, I'm fine with how the art is handled as of now. My only beef is that gender is irreversible choice.
Actually, now that I think about it, if genders weren't preset as they are, we wouldn't have the harassment problems that I spoke of earlier. Make it like AQ, ya know?
Actually, now that I think about it, if genders weren't preset as they are, we wouldn't have the harassment problems that I spoke of earlier. Make it like AQ, ya know?
Re: Female Armors
Evangel wrote:Look what they did for Shadowslayer Z and the Vampire Emissary and Knight. Do they look like rubbish because no skin is showing for the female versions? I don't think they do.
Well actually Vampire Emissary looks like a cheap version of Shadow Weaver.
SS- Member
- Number of posts : 85
User Points : 5714
Age : 30
Location : Australia
Re: Female Armors
/facepalm
For the love of.....
WHY IS THERE EVEN A DEBATE ON THIS?!?!?!
It's NOT 'E for Everyone', its 'E-10 and up'.
Now seriously, think about what we are debating on here. We are debating on armours that show skin. Animated. Kay, so, if i were 10 and went to the local beach, somethign would have to be done about it? Just because its animated artwork doesn't mean a bikini is unacceptable. Oh, next thing you know its illegal to have babies brest fed because of NUDITY. Everyone here saying AQW is *insert soemthing here* with female armours, your over-reacting.
10 year olds ARE NOT going to notice, or think anything of, a bikini armour, or a armour showing the thigh, or a leotard, or a low-neck dress, etc, etc. They are going to play AQW and have fun playing it, you know, like what the main focus on a game should be?
Give me ONE THING in AQW that is inappropriate for AQW, and tell me why 10 year olds would notice it, and think something of it. Thats right. YOU CAN'T.
AQW is a Online Game, not only that, a ANIME-based MMORPG. There is nothing in AQW that is worse than some of the things 13 and under's can watch on television.
This whole thing is just pointless.
Just stop. It's a waste of time arguing about this.
BTW,
This game is anime-based. Ever seen a Anime-cosplay-con?
For the love of.....
WHY IS THERE EVEN A DEBATE ON THIS?!?!?!
It's NOT 'E for Everyone', its 'E-10 and up'.
Now seriously, think about what we are debating on here. We are debating on armours that show skin. Animated. Kay, so, if i were 10 and went to the local beach, somethign would have to be done about it? Just because its animated artwork doesn't mean a bikini is unacceptable. Oh, next thing you know its illegal to have babies brest fed because of NUDITY. Everyone here saying AQW is *insert soemthing here* with female armours, your over-reacting.
10 year olds ARE NOT going to notice, or think anything of, a bikini armour, or a armour showing the thigh, or a leotard, or a low-neck dress, etc, etc. They are going to play AQW and have fun playing it, you know, like what the main focus on a game should be?
Give me ONE THING in AQW that is inappropriate for AQW, and tell me why 10 year olds would notice it, and think something of it. Thats right. YOU CAN'T.
AQW is a Online Game, not only that, a ANIME-based MMORPG. There is nothing in AQW that is worse than some of the things 13 and under's can watch on television.
This whole thing is just pointless.
Just stop. It's a waste of time arguing about this.
BTW,
Evangel wrote:That's a whole different story. At a swimming pool, you have to wear revealing clothes, its not like you're gonna swim fully dressed. I'm talking about UNNECESSARY PARTIAL NUDITY. Like, almost every single female armor having exposed thighs.
Would a person in real life wear something like that? A full suit or armor with the exception of the thigh?
This game is anime-based. Ever seen a Anime-cosplay-con?
Re: Female Armors
Man, the more I see this discussion, the more I want to slap someone.
SOME PEOPLE LIKE TO WEAR REVEALING CLOTHES
SOME DO NOT
AQW HAS ARMOURS FOR BOTH
QUIT COMPLAINING AND WEAR WHAT SUITS YOU!
SOME PEOPLE LIKE TO WEAR REVEALING CLOTHES
SOME DO NOT
AQW HAS ARMOURS FOR BOTH
QUIT COMPLAINING AND WEAR WHAT SUITS YOU!
Guest- Guest
Re: Female Armors
I don't understand anymore why this fighting is going on. Sebi said it nearly the way I would, except in caps. I didn't even pay attention to the female armors before, until this was brought up. There is no nudity, therefore I see no problem. One person on twitter just mentioned it, because they over-exaggerate everything and probably have issues, and then everyone else exploded over it.
Erik- Soul Collector
- Zard :
Number of posts : 4350
User Points : 1045749
Age : 29
Location : Firelink Shrine
Re: Female Armors
I request a Lock.
Nagi- Bucket Queen
- Zard :
Number of posts : 1138
User Points : 66990
Age : 29
Location : with my laptop...duh
Re: Female Armors
I second that lock request...
And I also add a zipper-on-everyone-who-keeps-complaining-about-this-all-the-time-mouth request, dont mean to sound like a jerk but this has turned from a a reasonable argument to an all out flame war!
Also, Id like to add one more thing to everyone who thinks that these armour are revealing, at least 50% of players happen to like it that way, consider that the next time you complain!
And I also add a zipper-on-everyone-who-keeps-complaining-about-this-all-the-time-mouth request, dont mean to sound like a jerk but this has turned from a a reasonable argument to an all out flame war!
Also, Id like to add one more thing to everyone who thinks that these armour are revealing, at least 50% of players happen to like it that way, consider that the next time you complain!
Guest- Guest
Page 6 of 7 • 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
Similar topics
» What armor you would like to see on aqw?
» Show off ur r10 armors
» AQW classes/over armors
» Corrupt a Wish 3
» Custom Armors!
» Show off ur r10 armors
» AQW classes/over armors
» Corrupt a Wish 3
» Custom Armors!
[TR] - Take Away Tom :: TR :: Dumpster
Page 6 of 7
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum